![]() I had the same choice to make when i bought a cam, and ended up buying a Comp Cams '4x4' cam for my 454 from their extreme energy line. I just thought about the thumpr more for that mean sound at idle but I just want it to run good and be reliable.Īnd keep in mind, I wasn't trying to bash the thumpr cam, it's just you'll have to make a decision on what is more important - sound at idle, or driveability and performance. So do those Summitt cams seem like good quality stuff? Thanks for all the input guys. ![]() Unless you have everything else to match the cam, happiness is often a smaller cam. If it was my truck and was mostly stock (exhaust,gears,etc.) I would lean more towards their 60101 cam. He is no longer with Lunati but says that the voodoo line "really works". He then formed his own company called Ultradyne Cams, and from what I have read, he is a "cam designing genius". He designed cams for Comp Cams back in the 70s. It seems that a guy named Harrold Brookshire is the one who designed them. ![]() I've done some research on the new Voodoo line of cams from Lunati. If you have 4.10s and a 2500 stall convertor it would work a lot better. It will sound bad ass but will have wasy less low end torque than your stock cam. I think that thumper cam will be disappointing in daily driving where most of your time is spent under 2500 rpm. So any cam with more lift than that won't be able to reach its full potential.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |